Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

ANANT PRAKASH SINHA @ ANANT SINHA versus STATE OF HARYANA & ANR.

Decided
4 March 2016
Judges listed
DIPAK MISRA (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)

Citations

Official
[2016] 2 S.C.R. 128 · 2016 INSC 248
Also cited as
  • (2016) 6 SCC 105 (28 citing judgments)
  • AIR 2016 SC 1197 (5 citing judgments)
  • (2016) 2 SCC(CRI) 525 (4 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown
1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 1 other Supreme Court judgment we hold.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.