Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

KARNATAKA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION versus P.S. RAMAKRISHNA

Decided
17 January 1996
Judges listed
K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA, S.B. MAJMUDAR (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official
[1996] 1 S.C.R. 692 · 1996 INSC 80
Not shown
1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Though the notice was sent to the respondent on September 28, 1993, it came back with an endorsement "Not present. Hence return to sender". It would be obvious that the respondent is avoiding service. Notice must, therefore, be deemed to have been on the respondent.

p. 692, margin E

Leave granted.

p. 692, margin F

The controversy raised in this case is covered by the decision of this Court in Kamataka Public Se1vice Commission & Ors. v. B.M. Vijaya Shanker & Ors., [1992] 2 sec 206.

p. 692, margin F

Following the said decision, the appeal is allowed and the order of the Tribunal is set aside, but without costs. G.N. Appeal allowed.

p. 692, margin G