Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

INCOME - TAX OFFICER, TUTICORIN versus T. S. DEVINATH NADAR & ORS.

Decided
25 October 1967
Judges listed
K.N. WANCHOO (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official
[1968] 2 S.C.R. 33 · 1967 INSC 242
Also cited as
  • AIR 1968 SC 623 (8 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown
2 other citation strings that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 2 other Supreme Court judgments we hold.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

In accordance with the opinion of the majority the appeals ,are allowed, the judgment and order of the High Court of Madras are set aside and the orders of rectification passed by the Income tax Officer are held to be effective and binding on the respondents. In the circu1mtanccs there will be no order as costs of these appeals. G.C.

p. 54, margin C