Supreme Court of India

STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. versus BALBIR SINGH ETC. ETC.

Decided: 6 October 1975
Judges listed: A. ALAGIRISWAMI (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Disposed off

Citations

Official

[1976] 2 S.C.R. 115 · 1975 INSC 238

Also cited as

(1976) 3 SCC 242 (4 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 6 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

THE JOINT DIRECTOR (RAYALASEEMA), ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU, A.P. & ANR. ETC. versus DAYAM PEDA RANGA RAO ETC. 8 January 2026 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 11 and 2 other paragraphs
THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAX, RANCHI AND ANR. versus M/S. SWARN REKHA COKES AND COALS PVT. LTD. AND ORS. 7 May 2004 · bench of 2 judges
RAM BADAN RAI AND ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. 9 November 1998 · bench of 2 judges
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. versus DINANATH SHANTARAM KAREKAR AND ORS. 30 July 1998 · bench of 2 judges
DHAYANAND ETC. ETC. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. 12 September 1995 · bench of 2 judges

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.