Supreme Court of India

GRAMOPHONE COMPANY OF INDIA LTD. versus BIRENDRA BAHADUR PANDEY & ORS.

Decided: 21 February 1984
Judges listed: O. CHINNAPPA REDDY (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official

[1984] 2 S.C.R. 664 · 1984 INSC 40

Also cited as

(1984) 2 SCC 534 (20 citing judgments)
AIR 1984 SC 667 (7 citing judgments)
(1984) SCC(CRI) 313 (2 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

2 other citation strings that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 14 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

GENE CAMPAIGN & ANR. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 23 July 2024 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 20
THE CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF TRUSTEES, COCHIN PORT TRUST versus M/S AREBEE STAR MARITIME AGENCIES PVT. LTD. & ORS. 5 August 2020 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 34 and 1 other paragraph
STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS versus FR. WILLIAM FERNANDEZ ETC. ETC. 9 October 2017 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 122
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, BANGALORE versus M/S. G. M. EXPORTS & OTHERS 23 September 2015 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 20
NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 15 April 2014 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 51

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.