Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

PRABHU DAYAL DEORAH ETC. ETC. versus THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KAMRUP & ORS.

Decided
11 October 1973
Judges listed
KUTTYIL KURIEN MATHEW (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Dismissed

Citations

Official
[1974] 2 S.C.R. 12 · 1973 INSC 185
Also cited as
  • (1974) 1 SCC 103 (12 citing judgments)
  • AIR 1974 SC 183 (7 citing judgments)
  • (1974) SCC(CRI) 18 (4 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown
2 other citation strings that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 7 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

In view of the majority judgment, the rule nisi is made absolute. We direct the immediate release of the petitioners from custody. V.P.S.

p. 38, margin A