Supreme Court of India

DECCAN MERCHANTS CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. versus M/S. DALICHAND JUGRAJ JAIN AND ORS.

Decided: 29 August 1968
Judges listed: S.M. SIKRI (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Dismissed

Citations

Official

[1969] 1 S.C.R. 887 · 1968 INSC 214

Also cited as

AIR 1969 SC 1320 (18 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

2 other citation strings that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 10 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

ZENITH DRUGS & ALLIED AGENCIES PVT. LTD. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SHRI UDAY KRISHNA PAUL versus M/S. NICHOLAS PIRAMAL INDIA LTD. 30 July 2019 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 17
VIDYA DROLIA & ORS. versus DURGA TRADING CORPORATION 28 February 2019 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 17
BHANUSHALI HOUSING COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. versus MANGILAL & ORS. 24 July 2015 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 7
GHAZIABAD ZILA SAHAKARI BANK LTD. versus ADDL. LABOUR COMMISSIONER& ORS. 17 January 2007 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 38
MORINDA COOPERATIVE SUGAR MILLS LTD. versus MORINDA COOP. SUGAR MILLS WORKERS UNION 2 July 2006 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 3

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.