Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

BASHESHAR NATH versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI & RAJASTHAN & ANOTHER.

Decided
19 November 1958
Judges listed
SUDHI RANJAN DAS (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official
[1959] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 528 · 1958 INSC 102
Also cited as
  • AIR 1959 SC 149 (32 citing judgments)
  • 1958 SCC OnLine SC 7 (4 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Cited by

Cited in 16 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

The appeal is allowed. The order of the Income Tax Commissioner, Delhi, dated January 29, 1958, is

p. 623

'd d d" d" I set as1 e an a procee mgs now pen mg 1or Imp ementation of the order of Union Government dated July 5, 1954, a.re quashed. The appellant shall get costs of this appeal.

p. 623, margin C

N. T. VELUSW AMI THEVAR

p. 623, margin C

v.

p. 623, margin C

G. RAJA NAINAR AND OTHERS (T. L. P. B.

p. 623, margin C

and A. K. JJ.)

p. 623, margin C

of

p. 623, margin C

of petitionof of

p. 623, margin C

Officer-" of of r95r of

p. 623, margin C

paper the fourth

p. 623, margin C

the the the State, by the the that as the Headmaster and the the

p. 623, margin C

the the that the the appellant the that the the paper the

p. 623, margin C

the latter had Headmaster at the and that, further, the institution private The the

p. 623, margin C

in the that the paper the rightly not the put the but the that in and that had teacher the

p. 623, margin C

The whether Je11ging the paper it the parties to

p. 623, margin C