Supreme Court of India

R. S. NAYAK versus A.R. ANTULAY

Decided: 16 February 1984
Judges listed: D.A. DESAI (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official

[1984] 2 S.C.R. 495 · 1984 INSC 32

Also cited as

(1984) 2 SCC 183 (32 citing judgments)
(1984) SCC(CRI) 172 (17 citing judgments)
AIR 1984 SC 684 (5 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 39 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

AMAN BHATIA versus STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) 1 May 2025 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 12
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH versus NIRMAL KAUR @ NIMMO AND OTHERS 20 October 2022 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 73
BANK OF BARODA & ANR versus MBL INFRASTRUCTURES LIMITED & ORS. 18 January 2022 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 49
DR. JAISHRI LAXMANRAO PATIL versus THE CHIEF MINISTER & ORS. 5 May 2021 · bench of 5 judges · cites it at para 356 and 2 other paragraphs
S. K. MIGLANI versus STATE NCT OF DELHI 30 April 2019 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 16

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.