Supreme Court of India

R.S. NAYAK versus A.R. ANTULAY & ANR.

Decided: 17 April 1986
Judges listed: P.N. BHAGWATI (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official

[1986] 2 S.C.R. 621 · 1986 INSC 86

Also cited as

(1986) SCC(CRI) 256 (14 citing judgments)
MANU/SC/0198/1986 (4 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

2 other citation strings that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 4 other Supreme Court judgments we hold.

TARUN JIT TEJPAL versus THE STATE OF GOA & ANR. 19 August 2019 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 9
STATE OF KARNATAKA versus SELVI J. JAYALALITHA & ORS. 14 February 2017 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 201
STATE OF TAMIL NADU BY INS.OF POLICE VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION versus N. SURESH RAJAN & ORS. 6 January 2014 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 20
HARINARAYAN G. BAJAJ versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. 6 January 2010 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 21

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.