Supreme Court of India

A. K. ROY, ETC. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

Decided: 28 December 1981
Judges listed: Y.V. CHANDRACHUD (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Disposed off

Citations

Official

[1982] 2 S.C.R. 272 · 1981 INSC 210

Also cited as

(1982) 1 SCC 271 (81 citing judgments)
AIR 1982 SC 710 (30 citing judgments)
(1982) SCC(CRI) 152 (22 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 55 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. versus BHUPENDRA SINGH 8 August 2024 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 25
PESALA NOOKARAJU versus THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS 16 August 2023 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 37
RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED versus SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA & ORS. 5 August 2022 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 43
T. TAKANO versus SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA & ANR. 18 February 2022 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 36
UNION OF INDIA 2. JOINT SECRETARY (COFEPOSA), GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE versus DIMPLE HAPPY DHAKAD 18 July 2019 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 42

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.