Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR. versus RAKESH MENON AND ANR. ETC. ETC.

Decided
1 February 1995
Judges listed
A.M. AHMADI (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official
[1995] 1 S.C.R. 745 · 1995 INSC 88

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

N.P. SINGH, J. Leave granted.

p. 745, margin H

A group of Writ Petitions were disposed of by a Division Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court on 21.8.1993, which related to admission to the Medical and Dental Colleges in the said State. The Division Bench came to the conclusion that it was not open to the State Government to reduce the minimum qualifying marks in general English in order to make seats available to SC/ST candidates by virtue of the said relaxation.

p. 746, margin A

Some Special Leave Petitions filed against the same judgment in the connected writ petitions, (Civil Appeal Nos. 623-624of1994, Rajesh Kumar Venna v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors., Civil Appeal No. 625 of 1994, State of M.P. & Anr. v. Chitresh Kasliwal & Anr., were disposed of by this Court on 21.1. 1994. This Court allowed the aforesaid Civil Appeals and set aside the impugned order dated 21.8.1993 of the Division Bench of the High Court.

p. 746, margin B

These CivilAppeals have been filed on behalf of the State of Madhya Pradesh, against similar orders passed by the Division Bench in different Writ Petitions filed on behalf of the respondents. All the appeals are --disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 21.1.1994 of this Court. The appeals filed on behalf of the State of Madhya Pradesh are allowed and the orders passed by the High Court are set aside. There will be no order for costs. A.G. Appeal Allowed.

p. 746, margin C