Supreme Court of India
THOMAS DANA versus THE STATE OF PUNJAB
- Decided
- 4 November 1958
- Judges listed
- SUDHI RANJAN DAS
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Citations
- Official
- [1959] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 274 · 1958 INSC 92
- Also cited as
- AIR 1959 SC 375
Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.
Cited by
Cited in 5 other Supreme Court judgments we hold.
- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX JAIPUR versus PRAKASH CHAND LUNIA (D) THR. LRS. & ANR.
- TOFAN SINGH versus STATE OF TAMIL NADU
- MOONS TECHNOLOGIES LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGIES INDIA LTD.) & ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA
- S. KHUSHBOO versus KANNIAMMAL AND ANR.
- K.I. PAVUNNY versus ASSISTANT COLLECTOR (HEAD QUARTER), CENTRAL EXCISE COLLECTORATE, COCHIN
Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.
The Court's text
Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.
In view of the opinion of the majority, the Petition and the Appeal are dismissed.
p. 310
BHOGILAL CHUNILAL PANDYA
p. 310
v.
p. 310
THE STATE OF BOMBAY (N. H. K. and
p. 310
K. N.
p. 310
Evidence-Notes of attendance prepared Solicitor--Admissibility of for corroborating Solicitor-Statement, if communication another necessary for admissibility-Indian Evidence Act, I872 (I of I87z), I57· The with
p. 310
breach trust. When the
p. 310
certain the and the and the appellant in the
p. 310
the prepared attendance trial
p. 310
the the appellant that not
p. 310
the that the
p. 310
"statement" in the the statement the another and that it not any writing it not another
p. 310