Supreme Court of India

COMMR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI versus LIFELONG APPLIANCES LTD.

Decided: 9 March 2006
Judges listed: AR. LAKSHMANAN, DALVEER BHANDARI (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)

Citations

Official: [2006] 2 S.C.R. 1157 · 2006 INSC 148

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Unnumbered paragraph¶

Heard the learned senior counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent. We have perused the order impugned in this appeal. The Tribunal as a matter of fact held that the appellant has satisfied the requirement of not taking Modvat credit on the inputs used in the manufacture of exempted goods and therefore their case is specifically covered by Rule 57-CC as well as the decision in Chandrapur Magnet Wires (P) ltd. v. Collector of C. Excise, Nagpur, reported in (1996) 81 ELT 3 SC with regard to not availing Modvat credit on inputs. The impugned order, therefore, is not liable to be interfered with at the instance of the Revenue. The appeal fails and stands dismissed. No costs. 'R.P. Appeal dismissed.

p. 1157, margin E