Supreme Court of India

NAVNITLAL C. JAVERI versus K. K. SEN, APPELLATE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, D RANGE, BOMBAY

Decided: 28 October 1964
Judges listed: P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Dismissed

Citations

Official

[1965] 1 S.C.R. 909 · 1964 INSC 235

Also cited as

AIR 1965 SC 1375 (8 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Cited by

Cited in 9 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

VIJAY KRISHNASWAMI @ KRISHNASWAMI VIJAYAKUMAR versus THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INVESTIGATION) 28 August 2025 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 27
VINUBHAI MOHANLAL DOBARIA versus CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR 6 February 2025 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 52
SKILL LOTTO SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 3 December 2020 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 55
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, HYDERABAD versus M/S. DETERGENTS INDIA LTD. & ANR. 8 April 2015 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 16
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA ETC. ETC. versus M/S. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. AND ANR. 17 February 2004 · bench of 2 judges

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.