Supreme Court of India

SHRI HARISH TANDON versus THE ADDL. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ALLAHABAD, U.P. AND ORS.

Decided: 5 January 1995
Judges listed: P.B. SAWANT (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official

[1995] 1 S.C.R. 56 · 1995 INSC 7

Also cited as

(1995) 1 SCC 537 (27 citing judgments)
AIR 1995 SC 676 (5 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

3 other citation strings that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 9 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

NIRMITI DEVELOPERS THROUGH ITS PARTNERS & ANR. versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. 25 February 2025 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 42
NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (NOIDA) versus YUNUS & ORS. 3 February 2022 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 36
JUSTICE K. S. PUTTASWAMY (RETD.) versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 26 September 2018 · bench of 5 judges · cites it at para 372 and 1 other paragraph
THE DIRECTOR, PRASAR BHARATI versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THIRUVANTHAPURAM 3 April 2018 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 38 and 2 other paragraphs
PRAFULLA KUMAR DAS AND ORS versus STATE OF ORISSA AND ORS. 7 October 2003 · bench of 5 judges

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.