Supreme Court of India
GEETA DEVI & ORS. versus PURAN RAM RAIGAR & ANR.
- Decided
- 6 September 2010
- Judges listed
- MARKANDEY KATJU, T.S. THAKUR
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Citations
- Official
- [2010] 10 S.C.R. 969 · 2010 INSC 570
- Also cited as
- (2010) 9 SCC 84
Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.
Cited by
We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.
Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.
The Court's text
Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Paragraph numbering in our copy is uncertain (unnumbered_in_numbered_era). Link to paragraph N with #para-N.
Leave granted. Heard learned counsel for the appearing parties.
p. 970, margin A
This Appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 05th July, 2007 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur in D.B.Civil Special Appeal No. 10 of 2007.
p. 970, margin B
In our opinion, the Division Bench of the High Court has rightly held that the appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 07th August, 2006 did not lie in view of Section 100-A, CPC. The learned Single Judge had decided
p. 970, margin C
the Misc. Appeal No. 2777/2003 against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. In our opinion, this intra court appeal in the High Court was not maintainable in view of Section 100- A, CPC notwithstanding anything in the High Court Rules or the Letters Patent to the contrary. Hence, the appeal was rightly dismissed by the Division bench of the High Court and this
p. 970, margin C
appeal is, therefore, -2- dismissed. However, dismissal of this appeal will not prevent the appellants from filing a S.L.P. directly against the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 07th August, 2006 dismissing the Misc. Appeal arising out of the impugned award dated 20th September, 2003 passed by the
p. 970, margin D
Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Shahpura, District Jaipur in Claim Petition No. 177/2002, if so advised and subject to all just exceptions including limitation. No costs. R.li\ Appeals dismissed.
p. 970, margin E