Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

AXIS BANK LIMITED versus NAREN SETH & ANR.

Decided
19 January 2024
Judges listed
VIKRAM NATH (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)

Citations

Official
[2024] 1 S.C.R. 1183 · 2024 INSC 105

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Unnumbered paragraph

Delay condoned.

p. 1184

Paragraph 2

This application is filed by the applicant- appellant seeking clarification of the judgment dated 12.09.2023 passed in Civil Appeal No.2085 of 2022.

p. 1184

Paragraph 3

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

p. 1184

Paragraph 4

The word “unsecured creditor” referred to in paragraph 20 of the judgment be now read as “secured creditor”.

p. 1184

Paragraph 5

Judgment dated 12.09.2023 is corrected to the above extent only.

p. 1184

Paragraph 6

Miscellaneous application is disposed of accordingly. Headnotes prepared by: Bibhuti Bhushan Bose Result of the case: M.A. disposed of.

p. 1184