Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

AJAYINDER SANGWAN & ORS. versus BAR COUNCIL OF DELHI

Decided
24 November 2017
Judges listed
R.K. AGRAWAL (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Directions issued

Citations

Official
[2017] 11 S.C.R. 264 ยท 2017 INSC 1141

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Paragraph 1

A bunch oflnterlocutory Applications forclarificationiimpleadmcnt/dircction/intervention/ appropriate order, in the lead matter, after the order passed by this Court on 23.08.2017, is being disposed of by this common order.

p. 266, margin G

Paragraph 2

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

p. 267, margin A

Paragraph 3

All the impleadment applications are allowed. Let them be imp leaded as respondents.

p. 267, margin A

Paragraph 4

Vidc order dated 23.08.2017, this Court had directed to hold the election of various State Bar Councils with certain directions. The said directions are reproduced hereinbelow:- "7) We have been informed by learned senior counsel for the Bar Council of India as well as the respective State Bar . Councils that the process of verification is not completed yet. In view of that, to do complete justice to the parties, it would be proper for us to provide a last opportunity for the same as mentioned below:- ( I) 15 (fifteen) days' time be given to cure the defective applications by the concerned Advocates and to all such advocates to submit their complete application fonns for necessary verification of their degrees if they have not submitted the same earlier, from the date of publication of advertisement in two leading newspapers, one in English language and the other in regional language having wide circulation in the respective State/Union Territories, for which advertisement shall be published within 7 days from the passing of this order. (2) l (one)month time for verification of applications. without any charge, by the State Bar Councils, after the expiry of the above 15 (fifteen) days. (3) The University Authorities shall ensure the verification of degrees awarded by them, without any charge, within l (month) on its presentation. (4) The respective State Bar Councils shall publish a Final Electoral Roll by including the names and particulars of such advocates whose degrees attached with the application forms have been verified by the concerned University authorities.The names of all such advocates who have not removed the defects in the application forms already submitted within the specified time and also such persons whose degrees on verification have been found false or fake by the University authorities shall not be included in the Electoral Rolls. (5) Bar Council oflndia lo declare the schedule of elections in respective State Bar Councils to be held after the expiry of 75 (seventy five) days, as mentioned above, within one week mentioning thercin:- (i) 15 duys for nomination. (ii) 1 week for withdrawal ofnomination. (iii) to upload final candidates' list in 1 (one) week. (iv) to decide the date of election. 8) We fiu1her make it ckar that all the steps be taken by all the parties concerned in the matter for the purpose of elections in respect of all the Bar Councils where the term of the existing members have already expired or to be expired. We further make it clear that although this order has been passed in favour of the verification only for the purpose of the election but it would also include for the purpose of the verification of all other learned lawyers who have already applied within the time stipulated by this Court. 9) We direct all the State Bar Councils to take necessary steps and to conclude all proceedings by 31 .12.2017 und send a reply to the Bar Council oflndia. Thereafter, the Bar Council oflndia. after receiving all the replies from the State Bar Councils, would file a status report."

pp. 267โ€“268, margin A

Paragraph 5

A number of applications have been filed by various State Bar Councils as also by individuals stating that the Universities are taking lot of time to verify the Law Degrees and the advocates who have submitted their forms for verification should not be left out from participating in the elections of the Members of various State Bar Councils with which they have been enrolled.

p. 268, margin F

Paragraph 6

An affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Bar Council of lndia (BC!) on 15.11.2017 wherein the report of the Minutes of the Fourth Meeting of the Central Verification Committee of the Bar Council oflndia held on 12. 11.2017 has been enclosed. From a perw;al of the said Minutes, we find that a total number of 15,34,531 advocates have been enrolled with various State Bar Councils. out of which, only 6,44.768 advocates have submitted their forms for verification. The State Bar Councils have sent 5,23,706 LLB Degrees for verification, out of which, the Universities have sent the reports with regard to only 1,65,339 degrees.

pp. 268โ€“269, margin G

Paragraph 7

The Committee has further found that the progress cannot be said to be very good but at least it is satisfactory. From the aforesaid, we find that the State Bar Councils have not sent 1,21.062 LLB Degrees fur verification to the various Universities. Further, the Universities have not yet sent the reports regarding verification of the Law Degrees in respect of3.58,367 advocates. Thus, about 4, 79,429 advocates who have already submitted their forms and Law Degrees for verification would be adversely affected for no fault of theirs. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts, we deem it fit and proper to modify our order dated 23.08.2017 and direct that all those 6,44,768 advocates, who have submitted their application forms along with Law Degrees for verification be enrolled and be shown in the electoral list. Of course, those advocates whose Law Degrees have been found false or fake as per the reports of the Universities shall be excluded from the electoral list. The electoral list be published by 30.11.2017 and the time schedule mentioned in para 7 of the order dated 23.08.2017 will start from 01.12.2017. The State Bar Councils shall conclude all proceedings by 15.02.2018.

p. 269, margin B

Paragraph 8

We make it clear that we have provisionally permitted those advocates, who have submitted their forms with Law Degrees but their cases arc still pending for verification to participate in the election by including their names in the electoral roll. However, if on verification, the Law Degrees of such advocates arc found false or fake as per the repi>rt of the concerned University then appropriate orders, in relation to their enrolment and also in relation to the elections in which they were allowed to participate, would accordingly be passed by this Couit on receipt of the report of the Committee.

p. 269, margin E

Paragraph 9

We also make it clear that the result of the .elections would be subject to the final result of this petition.

p. 269, margin G

Paragraph 10

The order dated 23.08.2017 is modified accordingly. We also direct the Universities to expedite the process of verification of Law Degrees and complete the same by 31.03.2018. All the interlocutory applications are disposed of accordingly.

pp. 269โ€“270, margin G

Paragraph 11

List the matter in the second week of March, 2018 on a Non Miscellaneous Day (NMD).

p. 270, margin A