Supreme Court of India

A. K. GUPTA AND SONS versus DAMODAR VALLEY CORPORATION

Decided: 10 September 1965
Judges listed: A.K. SARKAR (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official

[1966] 1 S.C.R. 796 · 1965 INSC 180

Also cited as

AIR 1967 SC 96 (59 citing judgments)
1965 SCC OnLine SC 49 (3 citing judgments)
MANU/SC/0014/1965 (2 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Cited by

Cited in 10 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

GANESH PRASAD versus RAJESHWAR PRASAD AND ORS. 14 March 2023 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 35
LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA versus SANJEEV BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. 1 September 2022 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 27
SOUTH KONKAN DISTILLERIES & ANR. versus PRABHAKAR GAJANAN NAIK & ORS. 9 September 2008 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 16
STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD versus TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL 1 December 2006 · bench of 2 judges
M/S. ESTRALLA RUBBER versus DASS ESTATE (PVT.) LTD. 12 September 2001 · bench of 2 judges

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Unnumbered paragraph¶

The appeal is allowed in accordance with the majority jud&'" ment.

p. 816, margin D