Supreme Court of India
MIS NATIONAL ALUMINIUM CO. LTD. versus RAJ KISHORE @ SAHU JENA AND ANR.
- Decided
- 9 January 1996
- Judges listed
- K. RAMASWAMY, G.B. PATTANAIK
- Disposal
- Appeal(s) allowed
Citations
- Official
- [1996] 1 S.C.R. 306 · 1996 INSC 41
Cited by
We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.
Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.
The Court's text
Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.
Leave granted.
p. 306, margin E
Though notice was served on the respondents, no one has appeared for the first respondent-claimant. The controversy is no longer res-integra. They are covered by the judgment of this Court in UP. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad v. Gyan Devi (Dead) by Lrs. & Ors., JT (1994) 7 SC 304. In that view, the appellant being beneficiary is entitled to be impleaded as a party in the pending proceedings in the court of Subordinate Judge, Angul.
p. 306, margin F
The appeal is accordingly allowed. No costs. G.N. Appeal allowed.
p. 306, margin G