Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

STATE OF KERALA versus JAY ENGINEERING WORKS LTD., ERNAKULAM

Decided
18 February 1983
Judges listed
P.N. BHAGWATI (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official
[1983] 2 S.C.R. 361 · 1983 INSC 12

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

VENKATARAMIAH, J. This appeal is filed against the judgment dated November 21, !978 of the High Court of Kerala in The Jay Engineering Works Ltd. v. State of Kerala(

p. 361, margin E

In Deputy Commissiner of Sales Tax (Law), Board of Revenue (Taxes), Ernakulam v. M/s. Motor lndu3tries Co., Ernakulam('), wo (I) 43 s.c.c. 492. (2) (1983) 2 S.C.R. 384. J62 (1983] 2 s.c.~. have held that any claim for deduction in respect of goods returned by the purchasers under Rule 9 (b) (i) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Rules, 1963 should be made in the assessment proceedings relating to the year in which the said goods were sold and not in the assessment proceedings relating to the assessment year in which they were actually returned. Following the above decision we set aside the judgment of the High Court in this case and direct that the assessment order for the year 1972-73 shall be accordingly modified . As a consequence of this order, the Department is directed to modify the assessment order for the assessment year 1971 -72 by allowing deduction under Rule 9 (b) (i) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Rules, 1963 and to ·make refund of any excess tax paid during that year.

pp. 361–362, margin G

The appeal is accordingly allowed. No costs. S.R. Appeal allowed.·

p. 362, margin B