Supreme Court of India

RAJA HARISH CHANDRA RAJ SINGH versus THE DEPUTY LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND ANOTHER

Decided: 30 March 1961
Judges listed: P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official

[1962] 1 S.C.R. 676 · 1961 INSC 129

Also cited as

AIR 1961 SC 1500 (68 citing judgments)
MANU/SC/0386/1961 (4 citing judgments)
1961 SCC OnLine SC 140 (2 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Cited by

Cited in 20 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

POPAT BAHIRU GOVARDHANE ETC. versus SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER & ANR. 22 August 2013 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 9 and 1 other paragraph
PREMJI NATHU versus STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER 9 April 2012 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 12
CHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD versus CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ORS. 15 April 2010 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 20
BHAGWAN DAS & ORS. ETC. versus STATE OF UP & ORS. 26 February 2010 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 10
STATE OF ORISSA & ORS versus CHITRASEN BHOI 16 September 2009 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 8

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.