Supreme Court of India

HARYANA FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND ANR. versus M/S. JAGDAMBA OIL MILLS AND ANR.

Decided: 28 January 2002
Judges listed: B.N. KIRPAL (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official

[2002] 1 S.C.R. 621 · 2002 INSC 51

Also cited as

(2002) 3 SCC 496 (102 citing judgments)
AIR 2002 SC 834 (29 citing judgments)
JT 2002 (1) SC 482 (14 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

3 other citation strings that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 16 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

ANUJ JAIN INTERIM RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL FOR JAYPEE INFRATECH LIMITED versus AXIS BANK LIMITED ETC. ETC. 26 February 2020 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 41
UNION OF INDIA versus ASSOCIATION OF UNIFIED TELECOM SERVICE PROVIDERS OF INDIA ETC.ETC. 24 October 2019 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 191
MOONS TECHNOLOGIES LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGIES INDIA LTD.) & ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA 30 April 2019 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 19
M. SIDDIQ (D) THR. LRS. versus MAHANT SURESH DAS AND OTHERS ETC. 27 September 2018 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 25
SRI PRABIN RAM PHUKAN &ANR. versus STATE OF ASSAM & ORS. 11 December 2014 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 36

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.