Supreme Court of India
AMIT KUMAR & ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
- Decided
- 6 February 2026
- Judges listed
- J.B. PARDIWALA, R MAHADEVAN
Citations
- Official
- [2026] 2 S.C.R. 402 · 2026 INSC 128
Cited by
We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.
Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.
The Court's text
Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.
Heard Ms. Aparna Bhat, the learned Amicus Curiae and Mr. K.M. Nataraj, the learned Additional Solicitor General for the Union of India.
p. 404
By this application the following has been prayed for:- “a) Direct the appointment of Dr. T.C.A. Anant, former Chief Statistician of India, as Technical Consultant to the National Task Force for comprehensive and scientific analysis of the survey data; b) Direct the Ministry of Education, Union of India, to extend all necessary administrative support, infrastructure, data access, and to provide appropriate remuneration / honorarium to Dr. Anant, as per prevalent norms or as may be fixed by this Hon’ble Court.”
p. 404
We direct that :- (i) Dr. T.C.A. Anant, former Chief Statistician of India be appointed as Technical Consultant to the National Task Force for the purpose of comprehensive and scientific analysis of the survey data. (ii) The Ministry of Education, Union of India shall pass an order of appointment of Dr. T.C.A. Anant at the earliest. (iii) We also direct the Ministry of Education, Union of India to extend all necessary administrative support, more particularly the infrastructure & data access and to provide appropriate remuneration/honorarium to Dr. Anant in accordance with prevalent norms.
pp. 404–405
With the aforesaid directions, this interlocutory application stands disposed of accordingly. Result of the case: Interlocutory application disposed of. Headnotes prepared by: Divya Pandey
p. 405