Supreme Court of India

UNION OF INDIA versus WEST PUNJAB FACTORIES LTD.

Decided: 24 August 1965
Judges listed: P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Dismissed

Citations

Official

[1966] 1 S.C.R. 580 · 1965 INSC 163

Also cited as

AIR 1966 SC 395 (5 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 6 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DHENKANAL MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, ORISSA, ETC. ETC. versus N.C. BUDHARAJ (DEAD) BY LRS. ETC. ETC. 10 January 2001 · bench of 5 judges and 3 other paragraphs
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DHANKANAL MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, ORISSA versus N.C. BUDHIRAJ (DEAD) BY LRS. ETC. 29 October 1999 · bench of 3 judges
RENUSAGAR POWER CO. LTD. ETC. versus GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. ETC. 17 October 1993 · bench of 3 judges
ST. JOSEPH TEXTILES versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. 17 December 1992 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 8
SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ORISSA AND ORS. ETC. ETC. versus G. C. ROY ETC. ETC. 12 December 1991 · bench of 5 judges

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.