Supreme Court of India

MYSORE STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION versus MYSORE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Decided: 8 August 1974
Judges listed: P. JAGANMOHAN REDDY (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official

[1975] 1 S.C.R. 615 · 1974 INSC 137

Also cited as

AIR 1974 SC 1940 (3 citing judgments)
(1974) 2 SCC 750 (3 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Cited by

Cited in 6 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

U.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THROUGH ITS CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER versus KASHMIRI LAL BATRA & ORS 4 November 2025 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 41
KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION versus BABY P. P. & ORS. 16 May 2018 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 29
KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION versus ASHRUFULLA KHAN AND ORS. 14 January 2002 · bench of 2 judges and 2 other paragraphs
GAJRAJ SINGH ETC versus STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND ORS. ETC. 12 September 1996 · bench of 3 judges
T.V. NATARAJ AND ORS. ETC. versus STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. ETC. 14 December 1993 · bench of 2 judges and 2 other paragraphs

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Unnumbered paragraph¶

In view of the majority decision, we allow the appeal and direct the Regional Tr,msport Authority to comply with the requirements of the Scheme as stated by us in respect of any permit granted or in re3pect ·~f renewal of any such permit made in favour of the third respundent .during the pendency of this appeal. M.K.

p. 642, margin E