Supreme Court of India

THE STATE OF MADRAS versus GANNON DUNKERLEY & CO., (MADRAS) LTD.

Decided: 1 April 1958
Judges listed: SUDHI RANJAN DAS (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Dismissed

Citations

Official

[1959] 1 S.C.R. 379 · 1958 INSC 35

Also cited as

AIR 1958 SC 560 (56 citing judgments)
MANU/SC/0152/1958 (3 citing judgments)
1958 SCC OnLine SC 100 (2 citing judgments)
(1958) 9 SCC 353 (2 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Cited by

Cited in 47 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

M/S ARISTO PRINTERS PVT. LTD. versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX, LUCKNOW, U.P. 7 October 2025 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 22 and 1 other paragraph
INSPECTOR, RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE, KOTTAYAM versus MATHEW K CHERIAN & ANR. 8 January 2025 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 21
RAVIKUMAR DHANSUKHLAL MAHETA & ANR. versus HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT & ORS. 17 May 2024 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 137
M/S TATA MOTORS LTD. versus THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (SPL) & ANR. 15 May 2023 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 10
M/S. TOTAL ENVIRONMENT BUILDING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD versus THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES & ORS 2 August 2022 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 6 and 1 other paragraph

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.