Supreme Court of India

ASHOK LEYLAND LTD. versus STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.

Decided: 7 January 2004
Judges listed: V.N. KHARE (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Disposed off

Citations

Official

[2004] 1 S.C.R. 306 · 2004 INSC 22

Also cited as

(2004) 3 SCC 1 (88 citing judgments)
AIR 2004 SC 2836 (24 citing judgments)
(2004) 1 SCALE 224 (8 citing judgments)
JT 2004 (1) SC 289 (3 citing judgments)
MANU/SC/0020/2004 (3 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Cited by

Cited in 38 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

STATE OF U.P. & ORS versus M/S LALTA PRASAD VAISH AND SONS 23 October 2024 · bench of 9 judges
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. versus MAYA DEVI & ORS. 2 September 2024 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 14
BAHARUL ISLAM & ORS. versus INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION AND ORS. 24 January 2023 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 16
THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS versus GOEL BUS SERVICE KULLU ETC. ETC. 13 January 2023 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 8
THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, INDIAN BANK versus D. VISALAKSHI AND ANR. 23 September 2019 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 29

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.