Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

C.B.I. BANK SECURITIES & FRAUD CELL versus RAMESH GELLI & ORS.

Decided
2 May 2016
Judges listed
RANJAN GOGOI, PRAFULLA C. PANT (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official
[2016] 11 S.C.R. 870 · 2016 INSC 1180
Not shown
2 other citation strings that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Paragraph numbering in our copy is uncertain (unnumbered_in_numbered_era). Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Jn paragraph 25 of the Judgment dated 23.02.2016 (by Mr. Prafulla C. Pant, J.) instead of words "Section 46 of Banking Regulation Act, 1949" the words "Section 46A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949" shall be substituted and in th~ last sentence of the paragraph instead of "Section 7 to 13 of the P.C. Act, 1988", the words "Section 7 to 12 of the P.C. Act, 1988", shall be substituted.

pp. 870–871, margin G

CRL.M.P. Nos. 6416-6420 of2016 are accordingly allowed.

p. 871, margin B