Supreme Court of India

ISHVERLAL THAKORELAL ALMAULA versus MOTIBHAI NAGJIBHAI

Decided: 10 August 1965
Judges listed: K.N. WANCHOO (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)

Citations

Official

[1966] 1 S.C.R. 367 · 1965 INSC 149

Also cited as

AIR 1966 SC 459 (11 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 5 other Supreme Court judgments we hold.

PRABHA TYAGI versus KAMLESH DEVI 12 May 2022 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 50
DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. versus TARUN PAL SINGH & ORS. 15 November 2017 · bench of 2 judges and 1 other paragraph
PANDURANG RAMCHANDRA MANDLIK (SINCE DEAD) BY HIS LRS. AND ANR. versus SMT. SHANTABAI RAMCHANDRA GHATGE AND ORS. 12 September 1989 · bench of 2 judges
STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. versus KAILASH NATH ETC. 22 November 1988 · bench of 2 judges
GUNDAJI SATWAJI SHINDE versus RAMCHANDRA BHIKAJI JOSHI 5 December 1978 · bench of 2 judges

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Unnumbered paragraph¶

In accordance with the opinion of the majority the decree passed by the High Court and the District Court is set aside and the appeal remanded to the District Court with the direction that it do restore the appeal to its original number .and do proceed according to law. Appellant's legal representatives will pay the costs of this appeal to the respondent. Costs in the District Court will -abide the event.

p. 381, margin E