Supreme Court of India

A. M. MAIR & CO. versus GORDHANDASS SAGARMULL.

Decided: 30 November 1950
Judges listed: M. PATANJALI SASTRI (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official

[1950] 1 S.C.R. 792 · 1950 INSC 30

Also cited as

AIR 1951 SC 9 (3 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Cited by

Cited in 2 other Supreme Court judgments we hold.

RAJASTHAN STATE MINES AND MINERALS LTD. versus EASTERN ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES AND ANR. 20 September 1999 · bench of 2 judges
JAMMU & KASHMIR STATE FOREST CORPORATION versus ABDUL KARIM WANI 31 March 1989 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 7

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Unnumbered paragraph¶

MAHAJAN J.-I agree with my brother Fazl Ali that this appeal be allowed with costs.

p. 798

Unnumbered paragraph¶

Appeal allowed. Agent for the appellants: P. K. Chatterjee. Agent for the respondents : J1.f. G. Poddar.

p. 798