Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

COMMISSIONER OF EXCESS PROFIT TAX BOMBAY CITY versus SRI LAKSHMI SILK MILLS LTD.

Decided
18 September 1951
Judges listed
MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA, SIR SYED FAZL ALI (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official
[1952] 1 S.C.R. 1 · 1951 INSC 41
Not shown
1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 1 other Supreme Court judgment we hold.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: our copy of this judgment is a PDF that also holds other judgments' text, so a passage found in it could be another judgment's; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.