Supreme Court of India

SAJJADANASHIN SAYED MD. B.E. EDR. (D) BY LRS. versus MUSA DADABHAI UMMER AND ORS.

Decided: 23 February 2000
Judges listed: M. JAGANNADHA RAO (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Dismissed

Citations

Official

[2000] 1 S.C.R. 1095 · 2000 INSC 95

Also cited as

(2000) 3 SCC 350 (41 citing judgments)
AIR 2000 SC 1238 (11 citing judgments)
MANU/SC/0122/2000 (3 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 13 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

M.S. ANANTHAMURTHY & ANR. versus J. MANJULA 27 February 2025 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 60
THE JAMIA MASJID versus SRI K V RUDRAPPA (SINCE DEAD) BY LRS. & ORS. 23 September 2021 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 38
M. SIDDIQ (D) THR. LRS. versus MAHANT SURESH DAS AND OTHERS ETC. 27 September 2018 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 69
RITHWIK ENERGY GENERATION PVT. LTD. versus BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CO. LTD. & ORS. ETC. 6 February 2018 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 14
M/S KAUSHIK COOP. BUILDING SOCIETY versus N. PARVATHAMMA & ORS. 11 April 2017 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 15

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.