Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

MR. RAJEEV NOHWAR versus CHIEF CONTROLLING REVENUE AUTHORITY MAHARASTRA STATE, PUNE & ORS

Decided
18 November 2021
Judges listed
D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, A.S. BOPANNA (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Disposed off

Citations

Official
[2021] 10 S.C.R. 1104 · 2021 INSC 756

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

1

In paragraph 32 of the judgment of this Court dated 24 September 2021, the expression “Collector of Stamps, Mumbai” shall stand substituted by the expression “Collector of Stamps, Pune, Rural. The order shall stand corrected accordingly.

p. 1104, margin F

2

The Miscellaneous Application is accordingly disposed of.

p. 1104, margin G